<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/</link>
	<description>Akismet Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 22:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mullenweg</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>It does have a link to the spam center on the dashboard, at the bottom of the activity box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does have a link to the spam center on the dashboard, at the bottom of the activity box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something I&#039;d like to see clarified. Last night, after a couple of flawless days of use, Akismet caught its first false positive on my blog. But was it really a false positive? The comment was actually in violation of my old restrictive anti-spam rules -- I hadn&#039;t yet removed them, though I have now. Does Akismet also catch spam that passes its own criteria but violates the blog&#039;s local moderation rules?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something I&#8217;d like to see clarified. Last night, after a couple of flawless days of use, Akismet caught its first false positive on my blog. But was it really a false positive? The comment was actually in violation of my old restrictive anti-spam rules &#8212; I hadn&#8217;t yet removed them, though I have now. Does Akismet also catch spam that passes its own criteria but violates the blog&#8217;s local moderation rules?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mullenweg</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Sure that shouldn&#039;t be a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure that shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Matt, as far as I&#039;ve seen, the current version number of the plugin isn&#039;t displayed anywhere at this moment. It seems a bit silly to have to download the plugin every couple of days to see if it&#039;s been updated, so could you put the current version number somewhere near the download link? That would help a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, as far as I&#8217;ve seen, the current version number of the plugin isn&#8217;t displayed anywhere at this moment. It seems a bit silly to have to download the plugin every couple of days to see if it&#8217;s been updated, so could you put the current version number somewhere near the download link? That would help a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kapeka</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>kapeka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Cool tool,

but why don&#039;t you put the Spam-Inbox directy as an sub-option of the dashboard? Now I have always to click on &quot;manage&quot; to see it there&#039;s new spam. Or at least you could give a small info in the info-Box in the Dashboar with a link for the spam management, similar to that how you do it with comment moderation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool tool,</p>
<p>but why don&#8217;t you put the Spam-Inbox directy as an sub-option of the dashboard? Now I have always to click on &#8220;manage&#8221; to see it there&#8217;s new spam. Or at least you could give a small info in the info-Box in the Dashboar with a link for the spam management, similar to that how you do it with comment moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>This is going to save me a lot of time - thank you for this plugin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to save me a lot of time &#8211; thank you for this plugin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Michela</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Michela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, Matt. I cannot wait to use this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, Matt. I cannot wait to use this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say I&#039;ve been using it since last night and, while I hope I&#039;m not speaking too soon, my completely-out-of-control spam problem seems completely solved. Thanks!

Er, no, most bloggers are not making $500 per month. Most bloggers use the numeral 4 to indicate the word &quot;for.&quot; I myself would be losing money on my blogs if I paid for hosting, which I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say I&#8217;ve been using it since last night and, while I hope I&#8217;m not speaking too soon, my completely-out-of-control spam problem seems completely solved. Thanks!</p>
<p>Er, no, most bloggers are not making $500 per month. Most bloggers use the numeral 4 to indicate the word &#8220;for.&#8221; I myself would be losing money on my blogs if I paid for hosting, which I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The corporate level sounds a bit low--aren&#039;t most bloggers making that much per month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corporate level sounds a bit low&#8211;aren&#8217;t most bloggers making that much per month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mullenweg</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/25/live-live/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Justin, I don&#039;t think that&#039;d be a problem. It sounds like you&#039;re both under the personal license anyway, and there would be no reason for her ever to have her own WP.com account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;d be a problem. It sounds like you&#8217;re both under the personal license anyway, and there would be no reason for her ever to have her own WP.com account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
