<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rising Percentage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/</link>
	<description>Akismet Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Hayden</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I have yet to get a false positives but since I&#039;ve installed it has also caught every real comment I have received.

I don&#039;t get a lot of comments to begin with and they did not look suspicious to me so i don&#039;t know why it seems to just capture everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to get a false positives but since I&#8217;ve installed it has also caught every real comment I have received.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get a lot of comments to begin with and they did not look suspicious to me so i don&#8217;t know why it seems to just capture everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World According To Sebbi &#187; Spam Karma 2 Akismet Plugin BETA</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>The World According To Sebbi &#187; Spam Karma 2 Akismet Plugin BETA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] The plugin automatically submits detected spam and ham back to Akismet.com which should make the service better with time (it already detects a lot of spam &#8230; 80% of all comments are spam they say). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The plugin automatically submits detected spam and ham back to Akismet.com which should make the service better with time (it already detects a lot of spam &#8230; 80% of all comments are spam they say). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Boakes</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Boakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>When I pulled that stats together from the trial period, I was aware that &lt;a href=&quot;http://boakes.org/akismet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my spam percentage of 74%&lt;/a&gt; was higher than the official group 64%.

The reason for my spam percentage being higher was that my blog receives fewer real comments than some of the other trial members (e.g. Matt), so assuming we all get the same amount of spam, the ratio of percentage of has to be higher.

My prediction therefore is that, regardless of the email trend, this figure will rise as more people use akismet to protect low-traffic blogs, because those low traffic blogs get just as much spam as the popular ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I pulled that stats together from the trial period, I was aware that <a href="http://boakes.org/akismet" rel="nofollow">my spam percentage of 74%</a> was higher than the official group 64%.</p>
<p>The reason for my spam percentage being higher was that my blog receives fewer real comments than some of the other trial members (e.g. Matt), so assuming we all get the same amount of spam, the ratio of percentage of has to be higher.</p>
<p>My prediction therefore is that, regardless of the email trend, this figure will rise as more people use akismet to protect low-traffic blogs, because those low traffic blogs get just as much spam as the popular ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.akismet.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akismet.wordpress.com/2005/10/29/rising-percentage/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Bit of self selection going on here, of course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit of self selection going on here, of course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
